Republicans Aiming to Take Away Voting Rights in 36 States

"More evidence that Republicans are determined to grab as much power as they can at the expense of everyone but the rich. Not satisfied with attacking the rights of workers, Republicans in 36 states are going after the most sacred American right-the right to vote. The We Party reports that through a myriad of proposals, they are trying to suppress the votes of traditionally Democratic voters, including minorities, the poor, people who live in rural areas, seniors and students." - Republicans Aiming to Take Away Voting Rights in 36 States; Notitas de Noticias, Hispanically Speaking News, Sat 5/28/11

First, who is this "We Party?" The We Party are a far left-wing, generally Hispanic minority group of conspiracy theorists who believe that the 'rights' of citizenship should be extended to non-citizens, especially illegal criminal immigrants who would steal the rights offered and reserved to citizens. When they wrote this article, they used the words "Democratic minorities, students, and seniors." Aren't there any Republican minorities, students, and seniors? Sure there are, but like all liberals, they don't care about the truth. They are not interested in legal minorities, students, and seniors voting. They rephrased the words to sound good, but when they said ...the most sacred American right-the right to vote, they don't say whose rights, but it's pretty plain. Do they mean Americans? Republicans? Independents? No. They report that through a myriad of unspecified, if real, proposals, the big bad Republicans are trying to suppress the votes of traditionally Democratic voters, including minorities. They lump the poor, people who live in rural areas, seniors and students into their list for political correctness, but they don't care about them. Their vote is a bonus. They control the book publishers so they can lie to students and convince them of their social justice an  they give seniors and the poor welfare, so they get the loyalty vote. Why do they never define their terms? What minorities? When they say minorities, etc., they mean illegal criminal immigrants. They have never mentioned Asians, Africans, Indians, Natives, etc. This is all about Hispanics, specifically illegal Mexicans, the criminal immigrants.

The We Party claims the Supreme Court decision allowing employers to obey the law and protect themselves by not hiring illegals equals "Arizona must penalize businesses that hire illegal immigrants. Businesses don't penalize illegal (criminal) immigrants, they don't have judicial power. The law penalizes criminal immigrants.

The We Party claims that gun manufacturers are responsible for the right to work in New Hampshire. They even oppose the right to work in a foreign-owned company such as Sturm-Ruger. They support the union campaign to make union membership mandatory to hold a job in America. Every American has the right to work. Remember "Pursuit of Happiness?" What do they think that means? It means the right to earn a living, own property, build a lively-hood, build a future, have a family, etc. That does not include government intervention or union membership.

The We Party believes that the government that destroys jobs, raises unemployment to record levels (near 18%) and artificially creates inflation and recession is the same government capable of creating jobs When The Private Market Refuses To. How? Simple. Artificially create a record unemployment by destroying free market jobs, then create New Deal and Great Society-type socialist government sponsored highway, railway, train, bridge, and other infrastructure jobs that are 100% union that forces manufacturing and marketing jobs to be lost or sent overseas and replaced by a construction industry where you have to be union or you are locked out of a job. In other words, either directly or indirectly, they would be government jobs. This is exactly the structure that destroyed the Soviet Union. The precepts of The We Party are very closely aligned with the socialist beliefs of the Communist Party USA, so the We Party is socialist/communist/Marxist. In fact, it would seem that The We Party is the political arm of La Raza.

According to their article, this We Party opposes voter ID. They think anyone should be able to vote. Citizens, non-citizens, criminals, illegal criminal immigrants, it doesn't matter. They are protesting the voter ID bills in Wisconsin and South Carolina, and the registration grace period in Florida which is designed to stop voter fraud. There are loopholes that allow voters to change their name and address at the polls, which means that a voter can go to several different precincts, give new names and addresses at each one, and will be able to vote several times. The bill would close this loophole. The We opposes this closure. Is that what they mean by "attacking the rights of voters?" First of all, there isn't anything to attack. The so-called rights to which they refer are not rights. They are not even privileges. Non-citizens do not have citizen's rights. This includes the privilege to vote. Even citizens do not have the right to vote. Rights can not be denied, but voting, like owning firearms, can be revoked for criminal convitions. If it can be revoked, it's not a right. The We Party takes facts out of context, then rewrites them from their own view.

Will it ever end?

Some people are now claiming that the first short-form Certificate of Live Birth was forged, as in, someone else's document was scrubbed and re-typed. The particular accusation is that it was his half-sister's Certificate of Live Birth that was used. That accusation is more than a little ridiculous, and so terribly hard to prove that it's barely worth mentioning. However, it's not that Obama, or someone else, used his half-sister's Certificate of Live Birth as a model for his own that's important. The important consideration is that it is a known fact that Maya was born in Jakarta, Indonesia as indicated on her long-form birth certificate, she has the same Hawaii state-issued short-form Certificate of Live Birth that Obama has. That has yet to be explained.

I did a search on www.birth-records.com for Maya Soetoro. There is one record for Maya Kassandra Soetoro, born August 15, 1970 in Jakarta, Indonesia, age 40, to Lolo Soetoro and Ann Dunham, Honolulu, Hawaii. Obama's half-sister. So, why does she have a Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth when she was born in Jakarta?

There is one thing there that points to other records raises another question, in the long form certificate of live birth Ann signed her name as Stanley Ann Dunham Obama. According to her bio she never took Obama's name, because her parents were opposed to the marriage because Barack Obama, Sr. was already married. Dunhan was called Stanley Ann Dunham, later known as Dr. Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro, and finally Ann Dunham Sutoro.

This is a birth certificate issue, so this is probably an aside issue. His parents were never legally married. First, Ann was only 17 when she became pregnant and was 18 when they were "married." (Having sex with a 17 year-old girl in 1961 in Hawaii was statutory rape.) Although she had recently turned 18, the right of a person under the age of 21 could not legally enter into a contract until 1971. They could have gotten parental permission, but both families opposed the marriage, so no permission was given, which means there was no marriage license, a misdemeanor in Hawaii; Second, Barack Obama Sr. was already married to a woman, Kezia Aoko, and had a child, in the village of Nyang’oma Kogelo in Kenya. Although this is legal in Kenya, it is not legal in America, so the marriage contract was invalid. Therefore, Barack Obama Sr. was guilty of statutory rape and bigamy.

{-Dunham and Obama Sr. were married on the Hawaiian island of Maui on February 2, 1961, despite parental opposition from both families. [Jones, Tim (2007-03-27). "Barack Obama: mother not just a girl from Kansas; Stanley Ann Dunham shaped a future senator". Chicago Tribune: p. 1 (Tempo). Retrieved 2009-02-16. Also, Meacham, Jon (2008-09-01). "On his own". Newsweek 152 (9): 26–36. ("Special Democratic Convention issue") (print)]-}

Jarett Objected, Obama Hesitated – Panetta Issued Order to Kill Osama Bin Laden

White House Insider: Obama Hesitated - Again.  Panetta Issued Plan to Kill Osama Bin Laden

"What Valerie Jarrett, and the president, did not know is that Leon Panetta had already initiated a program that reported to him –and only him, involving a covert on the ground attack against the compound."

President Obama was “overruled” by military/intelligence officials regarding the decision to send in military specialists into the Osama Bin Laden compound.  Was that accurate?

A: "...'we overruled him.' (Obama)  I have since followed up and received further details on exactly what that meant, as well as the specifics of how Leon Panetta worked around the president’s “persistent hesitation to act.”  There appears NOT to have been an outright overruling of any specific position by President Obama, simply because there was no specific position from the president to do so.  President Obama was, in this case, as in all others, working as an absentee president.

"...there had been a push to invade the compound for several weeks if not months, primarily led by Leon Panetta, Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates, David Petraeus, and Jim Clapper.  The primary opposition to this plan originated from Valerie Jarrett, and it was her opposition that was enough to create uncertainty within President Obama.

This update comes some 24 hours after our longtime Washington D.C. Insider first outlined shocking details of an Obama administration having been “overruled” by senior military and intelligence officials leading up to the successful attack against terrorist Osama Bin Laden.  What follows is further clarification of Insider’s insights surrounding that event.

Read more: http://socyberty.com/issues/white-house-insider-obama-hesitated-panetta-issued-order-to-kill-osama-bin-laden/

Arctic melt accelerating

Arctic melt accelerating! Glaciers breaking up! Polar bears are losing ground! Although there are some reports about the Southern Hemisphere, they are sketchy at best. What about the Antarctic? Polar bears have lived on land before, they will again. Glaciers flow out into the open ocean. They have nothing under them for support. They will break up. Sometimes they will break up in mass floes. It's natural.

 Have you ever read "Chicken Little?" The little chicken runs around telling everyone "The sky is falling!" after being hit on the head with an acorn. There is a recognized psychological malady known as "Chicken Little Syndrome" where a person is convinced of an impending catastrophe based upon faulty information. Conversely, there is also a personality quirk known as the "Foxy Loxy Effect" where someone will build the popular fear of the impending catastrophe, then take advantage of the popular fear for his own gain. Al Gore (Chicken Little) ran around telling everyone "The World is warming!" after noticing a few natural changes. He took the natural warming of the weather in some places, and called it Global Warming, which is simply a redefinition of something else, then he made an industry out of it. He then used the Foxy Loxy effect for his own gain. The fear opened the door for an entire industry of fearmongers to capitalize on Global Warming. If he is so worried about global warming why does he own four mansions that each have a carbon footprint of a small town?

Weather changes. Big deal. The magnetic poles shift, ice ages warm, solar storms rage, atmospheric consistencies change, the earth itself changes, polar glaciers flow out over the ocean and without support will eventually break off, and these all take time to make an effect. When they are felt, no one knows just which one, or which combination was the cause. None of these things point to a specific cause, but why let a good crisis go to waste. Blame it all on man and make a political agenda out of it to control people.

Fresh water freezes below 32°f and salt water freezes below 28.6°f. There is little evidence that temps will rise to anything like that any time soon.

Permafrost is melting? Take a look at what the permafrost layer is made of. It's rotten vegetation. Vegetation doesn't rot when it's frozen. If it's rotten vegetation, or a form of peat, it means that it has melted and refrozen time and again through time. Most of it melts to a certain degree every year.

There are 14.6 million aircraft in the air in any given year over America. They put out more hydro-carbon emmissions than all the cars combined. Should we stop flying?

The best carbon scrubbers are old-growth forests, but the same government that wants to control people and industry to halt global warming is the same government that encourages the stripping of these old-growth stands of trees. They'd be better off using new, fast-growing trees, but they can't see that. Better yet, use stone for buildings that would last a hundred years as opposed to a wood structure that would last 20.
This inefficient government is made of the very people who demanded green power during the 1970's, but they did nothing about it through the past 40 years. Now that they are in power, they want to force someone else to do what they failed to do, and they want to profit from it. Who says capitalism is dead?

The cleanest renewable electricity is hydro-electric power. There are more than 150,000 power-capable dams in America alone, but less than 10% are built for water power. Nuclear power is clean, safe, renewable power as long as it is used in a responsible manner. Don't be so stupid as to build a plant near a techtonic fault. Hydrogen power is not a thing of the future. It is here, now. There are so many ways of making hydrogen, all one has to do it to pick one. There are whole species of algae that release hydrogen as a natural by-product. They can be grown in silo-sized greenhouses where they release hydrogen by the ton. Landfills are being turned into methane generators. They can power large industries or small towns. We just need more. The landfills are there, they just need to be converted.

Plant trees everywhere they will grow. Stop polluting the oceans with chemicals and waste. Develop more efficient air scrubbers to break down carbon dioxide for industries so that no more industrial exhaust is released.

The bottom line is that global warming is an agenda to control people and industry. Otherwise, the focus would be on allowing free invention and development of ways to resolve the issue rather than on blame. The government has no business mandating what is to work. Let people develop their best ways to make things work and leave that alone. Government and politicians should just stay out of it.

We can solve the energy problem, the welfare state, and the unemployment problems all at the same time, and the government won't have to control it all. Planting trees, converting landfills, cleaning up the oceans and the land, developing new efficient technologies opens jobs. There are jobs for all levels, from pushing a broom to designing, manufacturing, and building.