Details Details Details!

Sep. 27th, 2010 at 6:24 PM
From LiveJournal

Obama could not be a dual citizen because US Immigration Law in force at the time mandated that persons born between December 24, 1952 and November 14, 1986, a person born abroad is a U.S. citizen if all of the following are true:
--1. One of the person's parents was a U.S. citizen when the person in question was born, and
--2. The citizen parent lived at least ten years in the United States before the child's birth, and
--3. A minimum of 5 of these 10 years in the United States were after the citizen parent's 14th birthday.

-Stanley Ann Dunham was 18 when she gave birth to B. Obama. Therefore she did not live in the US for 5 of the 10 years after her 14th birthday.

-Within 1 year of returning from Indonesia, Obama had been convicted of Grand Larceny and Auto Theft. p. 295 of Dreams of My Father.

-Dunham met Obama in 1959 when she was 16 and still in high school. It is claimed that Dunham and Obama were married on the Hawaiian island of Maui on February 2, 1961. Their parents did not consent to the marriage. In fact, the parents opposed it on both sides. Hussein Onyango Obama, Obama's father, was recorded to say that he would have nothing to do with the new family because he "didn’t approve of the marriage and didn’t want the Obama blood sullied by a white woman."
-Dunham was three months pregnant at the time of her marriage. Since Dunham was only 17/18 when her son was conceived the relation would have been prosecutable for statutory rape, since the age of emancipation act was not passed until 1976.
-Obama Sr. was already married at the time to Kezia Obama of Kenya. Luo customs allow for dual marriages, but the US does not. Because of this and their ages, and the fact that there was no parental consent, it is highly questionable whether there ever was a marriage.

-Obama states that he was born in Hawaii. If that's true, then why has he spent $1,000,000 of taxpayer money sealing every identifying record in existence?
-Why did Nancy Pelosi file election certification with the state of Hawaii stating: "This is to certify that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the national Democratic Parties balloting at the Presidential Preference Poll and Caucus." When she filed the very same certificate with the other 49 states it read: "This is to certify that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution and are duly chosen candidates of both the state and the national Democratic Parties balloting at the Presidential Preference Poll and Caucus."?
-Why did Obama seal all presidential records by the National Archives and Records Administration by Executive Order 13489, issued on January 20, 2009? Look at the date.
-Why has he not provided a birth certificate?
-Why has he not provided a name of the Doctor who delivered him?
-Why is he only using a Certificate of Live Birth, which is not legal under Hawaiian law as proof of Hawaiian birth, nor is it legal to use to prove citizenship on the federal I-9 form?
-Why does he use a CT Social Security Number?

-"If America was living in a situation where they feared ethnicity and did not see itself as a multi-party state or nation, how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America? It is because they did away with exclusion." - James Orengo, Kenyan Minister of Lands.

-As to Obama's citizenship is concerned, if he was born in Kenya he could not be a dual citizen for the reasons stated above. "If he was born in the US he could be considered a citizen. 'Natural Born Citizen' means born on the soil to a father who is a citizen." - Breckinridge Long.
-According to an examination of the very same question considered under "Is Mr. Charles Evans Hughes a 'Natural Born Citizen' within the meaning of the constitution? : A Legal Examination of the Subject by Breckinridge Long, of the St. Louis Bar" (From the Chicago Legal News, Vol. 146-148, pp. 220-222), a case in which the "Natural Born Citizenship" of Mr. Charles Evans Hughes was in question when he desired to run for president against Woodrow Wilson, the judges state "We find the positive declaration of the court that the “citizenship of the father is that of his child.” (1 Ruling Case Law, 796.)
-There is no dispute on the facts that the father in 1862 was an English subject. There can hardly be, under the law just quoted, any dispute that Mr. Hughes was at the time of his birth an English subject. If he was at that time an English subject, he became a citizen of the United States by a process of naturalization, and is not a “natural born” citizen of the United States. He became a citizen by virtue of the subsequent act of his father. He became a citizen by operation of law, but he was not at the instant of birth, by right and of the nature of things, a “natural born” citizen of the United States." Although it is convoluted and controversial, the present question would be answered by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. Under this ruling, because Barack Obama Sr. was a British Subject, Barack Obama Jr. would be a British Subject as well. This would be especially true since he did not qualify for American citizenship under his mother.

-It is also true that from the ages of 5 to 9 he lived in Indonesia. While there he attended a Catholic school, but had to be an Indonesian citizen and a Muslim in order to attend school in Indonesia.